Drawing for ULTRAHAPTICS

USPTO serial 79156950

ULTRAHAPTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRAHAPTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical apparatus for providing a physical response to a virtual object; computer hardware and software systems for providing physical response to gestures in mid airSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 2, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2020LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Mar 12, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 6, 2020RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 21, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 21, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 18, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 21, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 21, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 21, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 26, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 23, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 23, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 22, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance