Drawing for KEA

USPTO serial 79157079

KEA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOO, JEANE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KEA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Runners of metal for sliding doors; fittings of metal for furniture; safety chains of metal; bolts of metal; clothes hooks of metal; hooks of metal for clothes rails; hinges of metal; chains of metal; door handles of metal; latch bars of metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 31, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 24, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 2, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 10, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 18, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 10, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 10, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 2, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 4, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 4, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 3, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 23, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance