USPTO serial 79157165
B LA RUSTICHELLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 10, 2015
- Examiner
- PARKER, JUSTINE D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with B LA RUSTICHELLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LA RUSTICHELLA TARTUFI; INTERNATIONAL S.r.l.
IT
Other trademarks owned by LA RUSTICHELLA TARTUFI; INTERNATIONAL S.r.l.
LA RUSTICHELLA TARTUFI; INTERNATIONAL S.r.l.
IT
Other trademarks owned by LA RUSTICHELLA TARTUFI; INTERNATIONAL S.r.l.
LA RUSTICHELLA TARTUFI; INTERNATIONAL S.r.l.
IT
Other trademarks owned by LA RUSTICHELLA TARTUFI; INTERNATIONAL S.r.l.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miriam D. Trudell
Miriam D. Trudell Sheridan Ross P.C.1560 Broadway, Suite 1200Denver, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dried truffles, whole dried truffles, dried white truffles, thinly sliced dried truffle, truffle pate, "porcini" mushrooms pate, truffles and "porcini" mushrooms pate, pate flavored with truffle; vegetable cream spread, truffle vegetable cream spread, cream of green olives with almonds and white truffle spread, cream of green olives with walnuts and black truffles spread, pumpkin cream spread with truffles, asparagus cream spread with truffle, basil cream spread with truffle, arugula cream spread with truffle, sage cream spread with truffle, dried tomato cream spread with truffle, artichoke cream spread, olive paste; truffle olive oil; "porcini" mushrooms olive oil; truffle and porcini mushroom olive oil; olive oil flavored with truffle, truffle cheese | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Truffle salt, truffle flour, truffle rice; truffle maize flour; truffle honey; balsamic vinegar flavored with truffles | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LA RUSTICHELLA TARTUFI; INTERNATIONAL S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by LA RUSTICHELLA TARTUFI; INTERNATIONAL S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by LA RUSTICHELLA TARTUFI; INTERNATIONAL S.r.l.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named B LA RUSTICHELLA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 27, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 27, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 10, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 25, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |