Drawing for MARQUIS

USPTO serial 79157451

MARQUIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARQUIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Lamps; lanterns for lighting; cooking apparatus and installations; cooling installations and machines; gas scrubbing apparatus; heating apparatus; taps (faucets); bath installations; purification installations for sewage; electric radiatorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
021Kitchen containers; glassware for everyday use; porcelain for everyday use; drinking vessels; toilet utensils; combs; cosmetic utensils; heat-insulated containers; cleaning instruments, hand operated; toughened glassSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 12, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 19, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 4, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 4, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 25, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 4, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 4, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 23, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 2, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 31, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 30, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 25, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance