USPTO serial 79157499
BEELE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEELE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christina M. Licursi
Christina M. Licursi Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.600 Atlantic AvenueBoston, MA 02210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals used in industry; unprocessed artificial resins, unprocessed plastics; fire extinguishing compositions; fire-retarding compositions for commercial use, namely, for sealants; fire-retarding compositions for commercial use, namely, for heat-expandable materials; chemical preparations for use in industry in the field of fire resisting | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 006 | Pipes and tubes of metal; metal plates and rings for sealing systems, namely, steel plates and metal sealing rings; blocking and fastening materials of metal for sealing systems, namely, mechanical fastening elements of metal; conduits of metal, metal frames for engineered constructions having conduits, metal refractory blocks having conduits | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Optical and signalling, namely, rotating lights; life-saving apparatus, namely, life-saving rafts; fire-extinguishing apparatus; optical signaling apparatus which glow at low temperature for signaling | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Rubber, raw and semi-worked; polymer material vulcanizable to rubber, namely, vulcanized stopping and insulating material; sealant putty and sleeves made from these materials, namely, sticky putty and insulating sleeves for machinery; plastics in extruded form for use in further manufacturing; sealing and insulating materials; flexible sleeves, not of metal, namely, insulating sleeves for pipes or cable transits; sealing plugs primarily of rubber; fire-resistant sealing plugs made primarily of rubber; fire-resistant and non-fire resistant sealing plugs made primarily of rubber; waterproof packings for sealing pipes and cables; sealing packings, namely, packing material for forming seals; pipe muffs not of metal, for use with plastic pipe or metal pipe, insulating sheaths being insulators for electrical cables; sealing material for use in sealing and insulating buildings; sealing pipe muffs made of rubber for use with plastic pipe or metal pipe; sealing gaskets, namely, gasket sealer for use with pipe or cable transits; sealing sleeves made of rubber for protecting parts of machinery; sealants made of polymer material vulcanizable to rubber, namely, waterproof sealants; pipe muffs, not of metal, for use with plastic pipes or metal pipes; elastomers and elastomeric polymers, namely, elastomeric polymer in the form of foam with a substantially closed cell structure for use in the further manufacture of construction materials; foam plastic, namely, elastomeric expansion and contraction joint seals comprised of elastomeric foam with a substantially closed cell structure for use in building construction | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Non-metallic rigid pipes for building construction; refractory building materials that are non-metallic fireproof constructions, namely, fireproof tiles; non-metallic conduits for pipes and cables, namely, plastic tubes for protecting electrical wires; ceramic conduits for pipes and cables, namely, ceramic pipes and conduits | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Building construction; repair of sealing systems for pipe and cable transits; installation of sealing systems; installation of exit routes in case of fire, namely, installation of fire escapes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Beele Engineering B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named BEELE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |