USPTO serial 79157531
TASSONI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TASSONI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robyn S. Lederman
Robyn S. Lederman Brooks Kushman PC1000 Town Center22nd floorSouthfield, MI 48075Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | BEERS; MINERAL AND AERATED WATERS; NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, FRUIT JUICES, FRUIT JUICE BASED BEVERAGES, FRUIT-FLAVOURED BEVERAGES, SOFT DRINKS, FRUIT DRINKS, CITRON BEVERAGES, FRUIT JUICES BASED ON CITRON, DRINKS HAVING A BASE OF CITRON, SODAS; SYRUPS FOR BEVERAGES; PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING BEVERAGES, NAMELY, FRUIT JUICES, FRUIT JUICE BASED BEVERAGES, FRUIT-FLAVOURED BEVERAGES, SOFT DRINKS, FRUIT DRINKS, CITRON BEVERAGES, FRUIT JUICES BASED ON CITRON, DRINKS HAVING A BASE OF CITRON, SODAS | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 13, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |