Drawing for INDEXREDUCE

USPTO serial 79157567

INDEXREDUCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INDEXREDUCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software and/or hardware algorithm, pattern and architecture for searching, data traversal, data analysis and data processing; computer software and/or hardware system for enterprise search; computer software and/or hardware system for business intelligence; computer software downloadable online; computer software for cloud computing; enterprise software and hardware; none of the foregoing being in relation to the mathematical methods of index reduction for differential algebraic equationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 9, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 22, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 25, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 22, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 30, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 14, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 14, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 13, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 12, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 30, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance