USPTO serial 79158018
URBAN ARROW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5326327Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 7, 2017
- Examiner
- EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with URBAN ARROW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NL
NL
NL
NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shawn J. Kolitch
Shawn J. Kolitch Kolitch Romano Dascenzo Gates LLC621 SW Morrison Street #1100Portland, OR 97205United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Bicycles, electric bicycles and cargo bicycles; bicycle box cover, namely, fitted bicycle covers; rain tent in the nature of fitted bicycle covers; adaptors for installing additional seats on bicycles; storage nets for attachment to bicycles; [ bicycle seat covers and ] benches for additional seating for bicycles; [ bicycle wheels and tyres; anti-theft, security and safety devices and equipment for bicycles, namely, antitheft devices for bicycles, security alarms for bicycles, safety belts for bicycles; electric carrier tricycles; motorised bicycles; inner tubes for pneumatic tires for bicycles; tyre casings for bicycles; tyres for bicycles, cycles; spokes for bicycles, cycles; wheels for bicycles, cycles; ] bike accessories, namely, baskets adapted for bicycles [ , children's seats for fixing on cycles, bells for bicycles, cycles, pumps for bicycles, cycles, cycle mudguards, fitted protective covers for bicycles, rain protectors for bicycles in the nature of fitted bicycle covers, fitted tarpaulin covers for bicycles ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Smart Urban Mobility B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Smart Urban Mobility B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Smart Urban Mobility B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Smart Urban Mobility B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named URBAN ARROW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2026 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 27, 2025 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 27, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 18, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 4, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 3, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |