USPTO serial 79158116
SOUL SESSIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOUL SESSIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Arranging and conducting of seminars in the field of self-awareness, self-development, meditation, healing, business development, business education, business coaching, mentoring, business leadership and discovering soul purpose in business and personal life; arranging of seminars in the field of self-awareness, self-development, meditation, healing, business development, business education, business coaching, mentoring, business leadership and discovering soul purpose in business and personal life; conducting of instructional seminars in the field of self-awareness, self-development, meditation, healing, business development, business education, business coaching, mentoring, business leadership, discovering soul purpose in business and personal life; conducting seminars in the field of self-awareness, self-development, meditation, healing, business development, business education, business coaching, mentoring, business leadership and discovering soul purpose in business and personal life; organisation of seminars; arranging of entertainment, namely arranging live shows and entertainment events featuring interviews in the field of self-awareness, self-development, meditation, healing, business development, business education, business coaching, mentoring, business leadership and discovering soul purpose in business and personal life; entertainment namely live shows, live presentations and musical performances; organising events for entertainment purposes, namely, live speaking events, social events, musical performance events and recreational activty events; provision of live entertainment namely live speaking and social entertainment events that include interviews, musical performances and group meditations; television entertainment, namely, entertainment in the nature of television programs featuring entertainment and education in the field of self-awareness, self-development, meditation, healing, business development, business education, business coaching, mentoring, business leadership and discovering soul purpose in business and personal life | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |