Drawing for ACTO

USPTO serial 79158296

ACTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer; monitors computer hardware; computer game programs; television apparatus; horns for loudspeakers; headphones; cinematographic cameras; editing appliances for cinematographic films; transparency projection apparatus; projection screens; projection apparatus; audiovisual teaching apparatus; integrated circuit wafersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 7, 2019CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jul 5, 2019CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 4, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 7, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 2, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 18, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 18, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 17, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 1, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 1, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 18, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 18, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 6, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 20, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 20, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jan 16, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 15, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 8, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 8, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 2, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance