USPTO serial 79158305
REGIONAL ECONOMICS THEORY AND PRACTICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REGIONAL ECONOMICS THEORY AND PRACTICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Pamphlets in the field of regional economic theory; booklets in the field of regional economic theory; newsletters in the field of regional economic theory; newspapers; printed publications in the field of regional economic theory; books in the field of regional economic theory; printed matter in the field of regional economic theory; prospectuses in the field of regional economic theory; textbooks in the field of regional economic theory | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Rental of advertising space; computerized file management; book-keeping; demonstration of goods; marketing studies; business information; commercial information and advice for consumers; business investigations; marketing research; business management and organization consultancy; business organization consultancy; business management consultancy; professional business consultancy; business management of performing artists; news clipping services; updating of advertising material; word processing; organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; arranging newspaper subscriptions for others; organization of trade fairs for commercial or advertising purposes; sales promotion for others; advertising; on-line advertising on a computer network; compilation of information into computer databases; business inquiries; systemization of information into computer databases; business efficiency expert services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely electronic bulletin board services telecommunications services; providing internet chatrooms; providing access to databases; message sending; computer aided transmission of messages and images; radio broadcasting; communications by computer terminals; teleconferencing services; rental of access time to global computer networks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2015 | RDX2 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2015 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |