USPTO serial 79158511
NEUROLOGIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PHAM, LANA H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEUROLOGIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing equipment and computers; computer programs and software; computer programs and software in the form of an application for mobile apparatus and computers; computer programs and software for the uploading, downloading, storage, display and exchange of media and information via mobile apparatus, computer and communications networks; software for electronically exchanging and processing data, audio, video, images, graphics and text via computer, mobile, wireless, and telecommunication networks; parts for all aforementioned products; all aforementioned products not for medical purposes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Software development in the form of an application for mobile apparatus and computers; application service provider (asp) featuring software for use in creating, updating and modifying mobile applications; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in creating, updating and modifying mobile applications; scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis and research services; design and development of computers, computer systems, computer networks and computer software; computer programming; cloud computing, namely providing hardware and software via the internet ('online') for the purpose of data transfer and data transmission; advice and consultancy in relation to computer hardware, computer software and information and communication technology; maintenance, repair and upgrading of computer software; providing information in relation to information and communication technology; technical consultancy and providing information in relation to computers and computer programming; project management in the field of information technology; all aforementioned services not for medical purposes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 3, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 25, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |