Drawing for FILTERSPEC

USPTO serial 79158817

FILTERSPEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLLACK, ALISON FRIEDBERG
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FILTERSPEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Protective eyewear, protective goggles, protective spectacles, protective face shields, protective masks; anti-glare and anti-dazzle eyewear; safety helmets; respirators and breathing apparatus and filters therefor; protective powered respiratorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
010Ear defenders, ear plugsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 16, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 10, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 8, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 9, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 4, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 13, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 13, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 12, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 23, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance