Drawing for DEESHA

USPTO serial 79158933

DEESHA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEESHA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Imitation leather; school satchels; purses; vanity cases, not fitted; backpacks; briefcases; slings for carrying infants; umbrellas; canes; clothing for petsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
024Fabric; towels of textile; bath towels; knitted artistic fabrics of silk; bed sheets and pillow cases; washing mitts; table cloths not of paper; Hada, a piece of silk used as a greeting gift; banners; shroudsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing; clothing for children; layettes clothing; shoes; hats and caps; hosiery; dancing dresses; shawls; wedding dresses; glovesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 11, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 24, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 8, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 23, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 10, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 26, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 25, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 23, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance