USPTO serial 79159084
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Chuo-ku Tokyo 103-0014, JP
Chuo-ku Tokyo 103-0014, JP
Chuo-ku Tokyo, JP
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eleanor M. Lackman
Eleanor M. Lackman Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp, LLP437 Madison Avenue, 25th FloorNew York, NY 10022United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Key rings, namely, trinkets or fobs of precious metal; [ jewelry cases; tie clips; tie pins; cuff links; clocks and watches, ] all of the foregoing items made from fine leather, hand-crafted by skilled artisans in Japan for men and offered for sale exclusively through high-end boutiques, high-fashion department stores, and Lamac's websites and online stores | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | [ Photo albums; scrapbooks; sketch books; ] note books; [ felt writing pens; mechanical pencils; felt-tip pens; ball-point pens; fountain pens; writing brushes; stamp cases; stamp stands; seal ink pads; book markers; paper folders; ] pen and pencil holders; pen cases; [ paperweights; letter openers in the nature of paper knives; photograph stands, ] all of the foregoing items made from fine leather, hand-crafted by skilled artisans in Japan for men and offered for sale exclusively through high-end boutiques, high-fashion department stores, and Lamac's websites and online stores | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | [ Vests and waistcoats; gloves as clothing; neckties; neckerchiefs; neckerchiefs being bandanas; mufflers; ear muffs; headwear; garters; sock suspenders; braces for clothing, namely, suspenders; waistbands; belts; rain boots; shoes; sandals; sneakers; boots; women's shoes; Japanese style wooden clogs (geta); Japanese style sandals (zori), all of the foregoing items made from fine leather, hand-crafted by skilled artisans in Japan for men and offered for sale exclusively through high-end boutiques, high-fashion department stores, and Lamac's websites and online stores ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2025 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 17, 2025 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 4, 2017 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2016 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2015 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2015 | CRSN | CORRECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | CRCR | CORRECTION CREATED FOR IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |