Drawing for VALIO FIN

USPTO serial 79159411

VALIO FIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VALIO FIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; soups; eggs; milk and milk products; milk powders, dried whey products and whey powders; edible oils and fats, butter, margarineSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 5, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 3, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 10, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 15, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 8, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 10, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 27, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 11, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 10, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 3, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2015SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance