Drawing for X-CELL

USPTO serial 79159520

X-CELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with X-CELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Nutritional supplements for diets and health; dietetic beverages and foods for medical or veterinary useSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
030Beverages based on coffee or tea; preparations made with cereals for human consumptionSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 4, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 11, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 26, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 26, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 22, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 6, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 6, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 27, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 26, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 13, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 31, 2015LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW
Jul 24, 2015LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 17, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 30, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 30, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 29, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 28, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 10, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Feb 6, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 5, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance