USPTO serial 79159586
HOMELITE SIMPLY RELIABLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOMELITE SIMPLY RELIABLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Zhejiang Hehong Tools Co., Ltd.
Yongkang, Zhejiang, CN
Zhejiang Hehong Tools Co., Ltd.
Yongkang, Zhejiang, CN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hand tools, namely, fruit pickers; destructing apparatus for plant parasites, namely, hand-operated sprays for insecticide; plant parasite killing apparatus, namely, displacement pump sprayers attached to a garden hose for spraying liquid pesticides and insecticides; hand tools, namely, grafting tools; hand operated insecticide atomizers for industrial or commercial use; hand operated insecticide sprayers; hand-operated insecticide vaporizers for industrial or commercial use; hand-operated garden tools, namely, cultivator; hand-operated sprayers for insecticides | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 28, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |