Drawing for HOMELITE SIMPLY RELIABLE

USPTO serial 79159586

HOMELITE SIMPLY RELIABLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HOMELITE SIMPLY RELIABLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Hand tools, namely, fruit pickers; destructing apparatus for plant parasites, namely, hand-operated sprays for insecticide; plant parasite killing apparatus, namely, displacement pump sprayers attached to a garden hose for spraying liquid pesticides and insecticides; hand tools, namely, grafting tools; hand operated insecticide atomizers for industrial or commercial use; hand operated insecticide sprayers; hand-operated insecticide vaporizers for industrial or commercial use; hand-operated garden tools, namely, cultivator; hand-operated sprayers for insecticidesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 29, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 29, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 24, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 22, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2016MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 24, 2016ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 24, 2016OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 24, 2016OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 24, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 21, 2015OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 7, 2015OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Oct 7, 2015OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Jun 9, 2015ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 20, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 1, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 17, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 3, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 28, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 27, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 6, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance