USPTO serial 79159786
LINKFLUENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4948445Status 739Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 3, 2016
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with LINKFLUENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ZAC de Mercières n°III, FR
ZAC de Mercières n°III, FR
ZAC de Mercières n°III, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane B. Melnick
Diane B. Melnick Practus LLPP.O. Box 1101NEW YORK, NY 10028UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | [ Telecommunication access services; telecommunication information; ] communications by computer terminals or by fiber-optic networks; [ communications by radio or telephone; rental of access time to global computer networks; ] provision of access to global computer networks; [ provision of Internet chat rooms; ] provision of access to databases; provision of user access to information on the Internet; provision of access to platforms on the Internet; provision of technical data for technical information and development in the field of data and information processing, data transmission, message transmission, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; electronic bulletin board services; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; [ news agencies, namely, the transmission of news items to news reporting organizations; ] dissemination of information and transmission of data, images, texts, assisted by computers or via a communication network such as the Internet, namely, providing multiple use access to global computer information networks for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information [ ; teleconferencing services; electronic messaging services ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 8, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 16, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2016 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 7, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |