Drawing for DE CASTELNAU

USPTO serial 79159847

DE CASTELNAU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4787987Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 11, 2015
Examiner
VAGHANI, MAYUR C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DE CASTELNAU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie B. Seyler

Julie B. Seyler Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages except beers *, namely, Champagne made in France *SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 1, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 27, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 29, 2022XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2022XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 25, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 25, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 11, 2020REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2017INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 29, 2016COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Dec 29, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 27, 2016LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2016LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 13, 2016FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 13, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 11, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 24, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 26, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 6, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 1, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 13, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 9, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 4, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 31, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 15, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 14, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 13, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance