USPTO serial 79159932
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
L-1724 Luxemb, LU
L-1724 Luxemb, LU
L-1724 Luxemb, LU
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Greger
Jeffrey H. Greger Lowe Hauptman & Ham, LLP2318 Mill RoadSuite 1400Alexandria, VA 22314| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric kitchen machines, namely, food mixers, food processors, food blenders and food liquidisers; electric food mixers; hand-held electric food mixers; electric food processors; electric food preparation machines, namely, electric food mixers and food processors for mixing, kneading, mashing, grinding, mincing, peeling, chopping, slicing, grating, shredding, blending, stirring, beating, whisking, folding, liquidising, sieving, rolling and cutting of foodstuffs; electric food blenders; electric stick blenders; kitchen machines, namely, electric food liquidisers in the nature of blenders; electric kitchen machines for mixing, kneading, pulping, pureeing, mashing, grinding, mincing, peeling, chopping, slicing, grating, slicing, shredding, blending, beating, whisking, liquidising, sieving, rolling and cutting of foodstuffs; electric machines for peeling fruit and vegetables; electric nonrefrigerating mixing machines for making ice cream or sorbets; electric juice extractors; electric fruit presses for household purposes; electric food slicers; attachments for electric kitchen machines, all adapted for food processing; electric machines for making mixing or dispensing beverages; electric can openers, knife and scissor sharpeners, all being attachments of electric kitchen machines; electric carving knives; electric food grinders; electric food choppers; electric coffee grinders; electric spice grinders; electric meat grinders; electric meat mincers; dishwashing machines, clothes washing machines, combination clothes washing and drying machines; electric rotary ironing machines; portable electric rotary steam presses for fabrics; electric waste disposal machines, electric refuse compactors; electric vacuum cleaners; electric floor cleaners; electric polishing, scrubbing, cleaning and carpet shampooing apparatus; steam cleaning appliances, all being for use in the kitchen or the home | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 18, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 25, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 19, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 20, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 4, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |