Drawing for 10X

USPTO serial 79160186

10X

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, JUSTIN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 10X?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith R. Obert

Keith R. Obert Ware, Fressola, Maguire & Barber LLP755 Main Street, Building 5P.O. Box 224Monroe, CT 06468

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042research and product development services in the field of telecommunicationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 4, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 4, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 2, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 7, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 25, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 16, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 28, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 19, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 19, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 22, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 26, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 25, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 18, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance