Drawing for U

USPTO serial 79160303

U

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4893915Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 2, 2016
Examiner
WILKE, JOHN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with U?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine B. Redfield

Christine B. Redfield HOPKINS & CARLEY200 Page Mill Road, Suite 200Palo Alto, CA 94306UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Mugs; CupsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 20, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 25, 2023INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 19, 2023INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 19, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 2, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2020ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Dec 1, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2018WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Sep 11, 2018WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 19, 2016FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 4, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 2, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 2, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 14, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 17, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 4, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 8, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 10, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 18, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 18, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 17, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 18, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2015SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance