USPTO serial 79160421
LOVATO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LOVATO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Controllers for solar hot water systems; controllers for solar hot water pump stations; software for energy monitoring; water volumetric counters; gas volumetric counters | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Water distribution systems; heating systems; thermostatic valves (parts of heating systems); sanitary systems and devices; thermostatic temperature control systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Planning and development of software for control of heating systems; planning and development of software for heating systems regulation; planning and development of software for heating systems monitoring; research and planning of heating devices; research and planning of water heating devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |