Drawing for DRENCH JUICY SPRING WATER

USPTO serial 79160425

DRENCH JUICY SPRING WATER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VAGHANI, MAYUR C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRENCH JUICY SPRING WATER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Judith L. Grubner

Judith L. Grubner Arnstein & Lehr LLP120 S. Riverside Plaza, Ste. 1200Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Fruit flavoured non-alcoholic beverages; fruit flavoured non-alcoholic squashes; fruit flavoured non-alcoholic cordials; fruit flavoured waters; fruit drinks and fruit juicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 23, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 13, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 13, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 16, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 8, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 20, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 13, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 8, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 17, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 16, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 15, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 25, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2015LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance