Drawing for ZERO

USPTO serial 79160746

ZERO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZERO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GABRIELLE S. ROTH

GABRIELLE S. ROTH SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Apparatus for lighting, namely, lighting installations and lighting fixturesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 17, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 16, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 4, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 20, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 20, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 10, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 5, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 3, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 26, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 25, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 25, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2015SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance