Drawing for NFK

USPTO serial 79160792

NFK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NFK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Engraving machines; electric hammers; stone cutters; fret saw slices used as parts of machines; machines and apparatus for polishing electric; diamond blades used as parts of cutting machines and polishing machines; hand-held tools, other than hand-operated; electric hand tools; pneumatic hand toolsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 17, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 9, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 4, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 17, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 27, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 27, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 16, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 27, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 9, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 6, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 5, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 27, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance