Drawing for BALLET

USPTO serial 79160810

BALLET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COGAN, BRITTNEY LORRAINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BALLET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumes, eau-de-Cologne and toilet water and essential oils for personal use; deodorant for personal use; moisturizing creams and lotions for the body; shower gels; foaming bath gels; toilet soaps for non-medical use; make-up products, namely, eyeliner, lipsticks, mascara, make-up foundation, eye shadows, blusher and powder compactsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 1, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 4, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 27, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 27, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 20, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 19, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 10, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 23, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 21, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 20, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 27, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance