Drawing for PHYTOLOGIST

USPTO serial 79160890

PHYTOLOGIST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4893926Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 2, 2016
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with PHYTOLOGIST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Milena S. Mishev

Milena S. Mishev Secant IP, PLLC55 S. Commercial StreetManchester, NH 03101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated hair care preparations and shampoos used for preventing hair lossACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 7, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 2, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 27, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2023ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jul 27, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 7, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 12, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 2, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 4, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 2, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 2, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 20, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 17, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 4, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 9, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 11, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 28, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 21, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 21, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 21, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 20, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 27, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance