USPTO serial 79161178
KINETIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KINETIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KINETIC ENGINEERING DESIGN LIMITED
Albany, Auckland 0632, NZ
Other trademarks owned by KINETIC ENGINEERING DESIGN LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. May
DAVID L MAY NIXON PEABODY LLP799 9TH STREET NWSUITE 500WASHINGTON, SC 20001-4501Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Combination cutting and drilling machines for thick plate metals; drilling and milling machines; tapping and counterboring machines, marking machines; plasma cutting machines; flame cutting machines; oxy fuel cutting machines; bevel cutting machines; water jet cutting machines; pipe cutting machines; parts and fittings for machines for thick plate metal cutting, drilling, milling, tapping, counterboring, marking, plasma cutting, oxy fuel cutting, bevel cutting, water jet cutting and pipe cutting | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 26, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |