Drawing for SHOREDECKER

USPTO serial 79161187

SHOREDECKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4820331Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 29, 2015
Examiner
ESTELL, BRITTANY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHOREDECKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn Starshak

Kathryn Starshak K&L Gates LLPP.O. Box 1135Chicago, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Trunks and travelling bags; backpacks; travel baggage; luggage; luggage tags; suitcases; handbags; purses; wallets; satchels; cardholders being credit card holders; key cases, rucksacks; beach bags; tote bags; garment bags for travel; sport bags, other than those adapted to contain specific sports apparatus; leather shoulder belts; umbrellas and parasols; umbrella sheaths; walking sticks; canesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Apr 18, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 5, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 13, 2023INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 13, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Dec 15, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 19, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 15, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 29, 2020REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jun 17, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 22, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 22, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 29, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 29, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 16, 2015LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jul 14, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 14, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 24, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jun 19, 2015LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 9, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 9, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 18, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 14, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 14, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 14, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 14, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Apr 15, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 15, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 15, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 4, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 16, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 16, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 14, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 14, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 10, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 5, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance