Drawing for SODI

USPTO serial 79161193

SODI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, JUSTIN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SODI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Fermented cereal grains and barley grass-based dietary supplements in the form of powders, granular, tablets or capsulesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 8, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 4, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 10, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 26, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 10, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 9, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 11, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 4, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 14, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 13, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 13, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 12, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance