USPTO serial 79161214
OILA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HALMEN, KATHERINE E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OILA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | canned fish; canned mushrooms; canned peas; canned beans; canned corn; tomato paste; pomegranate paste | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Sauces; honey; pasta sauce | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | Olives fresh | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beer; mineral water; aerated waters; sherbet beverages; syrups for making beverages | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 10, 2016 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |