USPTO serial 79161219
BIG REVIEW TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4948453Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 3, 2016
- Examiner
- TARCU, CATHERINE L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIG REVIEW TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FRENCHS FOREST, AU
FRENCHS FOREST, AU
FRENCHS FOREST, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tanja Proehl
Tanja Proehl Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.300 S. Wacker DriveSuite 2500Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Production of video recordings for advertising purposes; production of video recordings for marketing purposes; production of video recordings for publicity purposes; online advertising on a computer network; online promotion on a computer network; advertising services provided over the internet; business advisory services relating to advertising; business consultancy relating to advertising; electronic advertising services; production of visual advertising matter; promotional advertising of business services; rental of advertising space on the internet; marketing agency services; marketing services, namely, search engine optimization services; production of television commercials | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Video production services, other than advertising; video editing; film production, other than advertising films; film distribution other than transportation; publishing of videos, reviews and webcasts by electronic means; production of films, other than advertising films; production of webcasts, other than advertising; online electronic publication of news articles; providing online videos, not downloadable, featuring product reviews, reviews of business; publication of multimedia material online, namely videos, reviews and webcasts; weblog and blog services, namely, online publication of journals and diaries | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Big Review TV Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Big Review TV Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Big Review TV Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named BIG REVIEW TV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 3, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |