Drawing for LOBAS

USPTO serial 79161307

LOBAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HISER, CHARLES
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOBAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Pulses for food, namely, preserved or processed beans, chickpeas, lentil, soy beans; processed olives, olive paste; edible oils; processed and roasted chickpeas, nuts, peanuts, walnuts, pistachio; tahini (sesame seed paste)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
030Coffee; pasta, noodles, macaroni, ravioli; spices and condiments for foodstuff; flour for food, semolina, starch for food; tea, ice tea; confectionery, chocolate, biscuits, crackers, wafers; halvah (Turkish kind desert); processed cereals and cereal products; snacks made of cereals, namely, corn flakes, oatmeal; molasses syrup for foodSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
032Mineral water, spring water, table water, soda water; fruit and vegetable juicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 8, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 13, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 5, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 12, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 9, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 17, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 26, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 10, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 16, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 4, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 15, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 14, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 10, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2015LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance