USPTO serial 79161534
CRUNCHY COS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5005460Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 26, 2016
- Examiner
- KUYKENDALL, LYNDSEY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRUNCHY COS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel B.V.
NL-2678 KX De Lier, NL
Other trademarks owned by Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel B.V.
Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel B.V.
NL-2678 KX De Lier, NL
Other trademarks owned by Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel B.V.
Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel B.V.
NL-2678 KX De Lier, NL
Other trademarks owned by Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel B.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael C. Cerrati
Michael C. Cerrati Belzer PC2905 Bull StreetSavannah, GA 31405UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Lettuce seeds for sowing and planting; fresh raw lettuce | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named CRUNCHY COS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 12, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 10, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 13, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 13, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 21, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 22, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 21, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |