Drawing for GEYER

USPTO serial 79161540

GEYER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TOOLEY, DAVID E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GEYER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Clemens Kochinke

CLEMENS KOCHINKE BERLINER CORCORAN & ROWE LLP1101 17TH STREET NWSuite 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
015Keyboard instrumentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 28, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 13, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 13, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 1, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 17, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 16, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 8, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 7, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 7, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 2, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 13, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 10, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 9, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 13, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance