Drawing for MULTIPRO

USPTO serial 79161570

MULTIPRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MULTIPRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Electric waffle irons; bread baking machines for industrial purposes; electric sandwich toasters; doughnut makers; pancake baking machines; electric crepe makers; electric panini makers; ice cream cone makers; electric egg cookers; popcorn machines; cotton candy making machines; toasters; convection ovens; grills cooking appliances; electric hot platesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 18, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 25, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 17, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 15, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 17, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 15, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 15, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 4, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 19, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 19, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 18, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 13, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2015LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance