Drawing for KODA

USPTO serial 79162277

KODA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GANDARA, KEYLA MARIA
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KODA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam D. Resnick

ADAM D RESNICK MOSAIC LEGAL GROUP PLLC5185 MACARTHUR BLVD NWWASHINGTON, DC 20016-3341UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing for athletic use, namely, athletic shorts, padded shorts, triathlon bibs, triathlon knicks, triathlon suits, cycling shorts, cycling jerseys, swimmers, swimming outfits, singlets, arm warmers, leg warmers, sports caps, sun visors; Footwear; HeadwearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 29, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 31, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 31, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 31, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 31, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 31, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 21, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 16, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 31, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 12, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 5, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 5, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 5, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 4, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 4, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 4, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 5, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 5, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 4, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 30, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance