USPTO serial 79162427
NORTHWOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHIMPF, TIMOTHY O
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NORTHWOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Pastry and confectionery in the nature of desserts, namely, chocolate confections, tarts; gateaux; cakes, cookies, muffins and biscuits | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| May 23, 2016 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 2, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2015 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 11, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |