Drawing for DIVAGE

USPTO serial 79162507

DIVAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DIVAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, including cosmetic creams; lipsticks, make-up powder; pencils (cosmetics); nail polishACTIVE—
035Sales promotionACTIVE—
039Storage of goods; packaging of goodsACTIVE—
042Industrial design; research and development (for others)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2025CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 1, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 14, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 27, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 30, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 10, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 10, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 16, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 31, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 10, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 10, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 2, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 14, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 14, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 31, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2015SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance