Drawing for L'HALEINE DES DIEUX

USPTO serial 79162548

L'HALEINE DES DIEUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4961957Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 24, 2016
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with L'HALEINE DES DIEUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell

Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell Blue Filament Law PLLC700 E. MapleSuite 450Birmingham, MI 48009

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps; perfumery; cosmeticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 7, 2022NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2022C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 7, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 17, 2022ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 24, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2016FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 25, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 24, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 8, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 4, 2016GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 17, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 23, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 20, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 12, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Dec 29, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 29, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 18, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 18, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 8, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 7, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 3, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance