CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for LUMIPOD

USPTO serial 79162559

LUMIPOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4911003Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 8, 2016
Examiner
LOVELACE, JAMES B
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUMIPOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald R. Naylor, Jr.

Donald R. Naylor, Jr. Air Liquide USA LLC9811 Katy Freeway, Suite 100Houston, TX 77024UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical products for use as raw materials for the manufacture of cosmetic products; Chemical additives in the nature of active cosmetic agents for use in the manufacture of cosmetic productsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
003Cosmetic products, namely, facial creams, anti-aging creams, moisturizing creams and make-upSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 21, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 22, 2023XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2023XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 23, 2023INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 23, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 8, 2021REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jun 8, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 22, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 18, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 2, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 26, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 23, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 23, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 22, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2015RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 21, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 21, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 21, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 20, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 3, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance