USPTO serial 79162624
CORKTECH HYDRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5038343Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2016
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CORKTECH HYDRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Floors and tiles made of cork; floors and tiles made of composition cork; paved floors made of cork, compressed cork or a cork mixture | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMORIM REVESTIMENTOS, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by AMORIM REVESTIMENTOS, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by AMORIM CORK FLOORING, S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named CORKTECH HYDRO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2024 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 24, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 24, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 7, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 10, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 7, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 6, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 5, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |