USPTO serial 79162651
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | ROLLS OF BAKED UNSWEETENED FRUITS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2024 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2024 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2024 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 9, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 7, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 24, 2016 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2015 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2015 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 2, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |