Drawing for GJ

USPTO serial 79162719

GJ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GJ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Holman

John C. Holman Jacobson Holman PLLC400 7th St., NWWashington, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Pens being office requisites; fountain pens; rollerball pens; cases for pens; stands for pens; boxes for pens; inkwells and writing inkSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 9, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 19, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 2, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 2, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 2, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 2, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 30, 2017CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
May 24, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 12, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 10, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 23, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 28, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 7, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 30, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 8, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 13, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 8, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 7, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 3, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance