USPTO serial 79163202
AGRUMATO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5010013Status 739Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 2, 2016
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with AGRUMATO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,700
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
IT
I-66034 Lanciano Ch, IT
I-66034 Lanciano Ch, IT
Lanciano Ch, IT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Vegetable pates, edible oils and [ats;] extra virgin olive oil; [ olive paste] | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | [Bakery products and confectionery, namely, biscuits,] panettone [and breadsticks; salt; vinegar; sauces; salad dressings; chili oil for use as a seasoning or condiment; pepper paste for use as a condiment; citrus oil, not being an essential oil, for use as a seasoning or condiment; spices] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AGRUMATO BRAND & CO. S.R.L.S.
- Other trademarks owned by RICCI LUCREZIA MARIA
- Other trademarks owned by RICCI LUCREZIA MARIA
- Other trademarks owned by RICCI LUCREZIA MARIA
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named AGRUMATO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 12, 2022 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 18, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 5, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 17, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 27, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |