Drawing for TIGER

USPTO serial 79163243

TIGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Eyeglass chains; correcting lenses optics; spectacle lenses; spectacle frames; pince-nez mountings; eyeglasses; contact lenses; spectacle cases; sunglasses; eyeglass cordsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
034Lighters for smokers; gas containers for cigar lighters; gas containers for butane lighters; tobacco pipes; cigar cutters; cigarette cases; cigarette holders; snuff boxes; ashtrays for smokersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 20, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 9, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 24, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 14, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 24, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 2, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 17, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 16, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 16, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 15, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance