USPTO serial 79163271
MIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4911089Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 8, 2016
- Examiner
- CASSIDY, COLLEEN MULCRONE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machinery for mining and machine tools, namely, drills for the mining industry and truck mills for mining purposes; mining equipment, namely, mining bits and mining drill sharpeners; machinery for mining, namely, ore comminution pressure plungers and ore comminution presses; ore mills, namely, end mills, thread mills, truck mills for mining purposes; grinding or crushing rolls, namely, grinding machines and crushing machines for industrial purposes; rock, ore, gravel, coal, cement and crushed rock crushing equipment and machines, namely, comminution rollers, crushing rolls, jaw crushers, gyratory crushers, cone crushers and impact crushers; replaceable wear coats and chucks for such machines, as well as parts and spare parts, namely, ball valves being parts of machines, fluid couplings being parts of machines, cone brakes being parts of machines; vibrating or oscillating flap discs for power-operated grinders which screen and separate rocks and ores as parts of aforementioned machines; saw-tooth setting machines, and machine setting vibratory screen separators for separating rocks and ores; centrifugal separators; drills for the mining industry; mechanical mining shovels; bits for mining machines; power drill bits for mining; drills for mining, namely, power augers for mining; drilling equipment for the mining industry, namely, drilling machines, power drills, rock drills; mills for vehicles in the mining industry, namely, truck mills; sharpening machine for mining drill; hydraulic presses; hydraulic jacks; engines not for land vehicles; machine coupling and transmission components except for land vehicles | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Building construction; repair and installation services for mining equipment; mining operations in the nature of mining extraction; mining services, namely, consulting services in the field of mining extraction; repair and maintenance of mining machinery and equipment | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 23, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 22, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |