Drawing for KALIMUCHO

USPTO serial 79163312

KALIMUCHO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5130789Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 31, 2017
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KALIMUCHO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus for recording, transmitting and reproducing sound or images, namely, video recorders, MP3 players, radios; software, namely, recorded programs for use as a framework in developing middleware, software platform and application stores; detectors, namely, sensors, wireless sensors to detect environment, namely, accelerometer sensor, gyroscope sensor, light sensor, magnetic field sensor, orientation sensor, pressure sensor, temperature sensor; technology platforms used for the development of new generation services and applications, namely, computer software programs for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images and moving picture into an interactive delivery for multimedia applicationsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
038Telecommunication access services; communications by computer terminals or by fiber-optic networks; communications by radio or telephone; cellular telephone communication; provision of user access to global computer networks; communications by computer terminals connection to a global computer networkSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific and technical research services, namely, technical consultancy in relation to research services relating to computer software; design and development of computers and software; research and development of new products for others; development, installation, maintenance, updating or rental of software; computer programming; design of computer systems; software as a service (SaaS), namely, service featuring software for use in database management, service desk management, and accounting; information technology (IT) consultancySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 20, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 23, 2024XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 22, 2024XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Apr 11, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 11, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 31, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Apr 30, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 15, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 11, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 26, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 26, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 7, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 27, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 21, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2016RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 23, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 11, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 16, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 22, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 22, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 16, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 28, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 28, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 27, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 20, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2015LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance